Hopeful about the new ambassador appointment but not pleased with the Republican response:
"But Republicans criticised the nomination as rewarding an enemy. 'With this nomination, our foreign policy again risks sending the message that it is better to be an intractable enemy than a co-operative, loyal US ally,' said the top Republican on the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen."
We have got to drop the term enemy when we talk about Syria, they are not our enemies. We are not at war with Syria. Syria is a vital player in the Middle East peace process and should be treated with respect and value for their position and influence in the region. The collective punishmnet of sanctions on the Syria people b/c of the US's disagreement with some of Syria's politics is ineffective and maintains a devisive and untrustworthy relaitonship between the governments. The appointment of an ambassador does not demonstrate complete agreeement with Syrian policy but it shows respect and value in a relationship between the governments. If the goal is to develop a worldwide political community of co-operative US allies then how would one expect to build that other than to put people in positions to build those relationship where they have been broken in the past? C'mon people! The Republican response is disheartening but thank goodness for those who stand in opposition to this attitude. We must push for peace and work towards saving lives. Hope resides in relationships.

